For physiotherapists and rehabilitation practices
I treat nobody. I work where your work ends.
The pain is gone, the cycle is closed, the person is discharged. And then they come back, six months later, with the same problem in the same place — because in the meantime they kept moving the way they moved before. That phase isn’t therapy: it’s movement education.
The boundary, before anything else
What I don’t do, and never will
I’m not a healthcare professional and I don’t present myself as one. I don’t diagnose, I don’t treat pathologies, I don’t intervene on acute pain, I don’t prescribe, I don’t assess clinical pictures and I don’t follow anyone during an ongoing rehabilitation programme.
I work only with people who have already been discharged, and only if you consider it appropriate. If something resembling a symptom emerges during a session, the person goes back to you: that’s a rule, not a courtesy.
The phase that stays uncovered
You get a tissue working again, restore strength and range, switch off the pain. What no rehabilitation cycle can do in a few weeks is change the habit with which that person has used their body for twenty years: which leg takes the load when they stand, which shoulder always carries the weight, which side every gesture starts from.
It’s the habit that often brought the load there in the first place, and that almost always stays intact at the end of the programme. It isn’t a limitation of yours: it’s simply a different category of work, requiring time and conscious repetition.
Two ways of working together
In both cases the relationship is with you, not with the patient: you decide who, when and whether at all.
One more way of reading a body
I train your team to recognise which side movement starts from and to read the rebound — an observable marker, not a diagnostic tool. What to do with it inside your protocol stays your decision. The competence remains in the practice afterwards.
Educational sessions, on your indication
I welcome those you have already discharged and consider ready: ninety minutes on the everyday gesture, not on the injury. I report back what I observed, and if anything doesn’t add up the person returns to you.
What it rests on, and how you can take it apart
The method comes from an experimental philosophy thesis and from research with stated hypotheses, observable markers and explicit falsification criteria. There are no clinical trials behind it and I don’t claim there are: it’s an educational proposal, and I present it as such.
If you feel like testing it against your own criteria, that’s exactly what interests me most. The research, with the documents and DOI →
What the practice gains
An answer for those who keep coming back
To the person presenting the same picture again you can propose something that acts on the habit, instead of repeating the cycle.
One more marker to observe
The rebound is observable in twenty seconds and requires no instruments. It’s up to you whether and how to integrate it into functional assessment.
A destination after discharge
Instead of leaving the person without guidance, you have an educational step to suggest — and they stay within your network.
An approach that sets you apart
Few practices offer a structured educational phase after the cycle. It tells well and says something about how you work.
This is how we start
A meeting with your team, free of charge.
Before any agreement: an hour with you, in which I show the marker, explain where my field ends and answer objections — which in this sector are legitimate and expected. Then you decide whether it makes sense.
Let’s Talk
Write me two lines: what kind of practice you are, how many people work there and where you think the point of contact might be. If you think there isn’t one, say so: that’s useful information too.
Or directly: +39 375 673 9760 · [email protected]
If you’re a person with ongoing pain: this page isn’t for you. Please see your doctor or a physiotherapist.
One body • Two sides • One choice